Ryan A. Zeli
Mr. Zeli is a Member with Zimmer Kunz. His practice is focused on all areas of civil litigation, with a concentration on general liability defense, toxic tort defense and contract disputes. Mr. Zeli has successfully represented hundreds of corporations, including manufactures, suppliers, premises owners and contractors in matters throughout the tri-state area, as well as, various courts throughout the United States.
In addition to his liability defense work, Mr. Zeli has been successful in securing millions of dollars for his clients through resolution of contract disputes, subrogation matters, employment disputes, and liability matters.
Pittsburgh’s 50 Finest:Recognized by Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and Whirl Magazine in 2009, as one of “Pittsburgh’s 50 Finest” for outstanding community involvement and professional achievement
Participated in fundraising with co honorees raising more than $200,000 for cystic fibrosis research
Undergraduate:University Of Pittsburgh, Bachelor of Science in Sociology 2002
- Recipient of Balfour Academic/Leadership Excellence Award
- Recipient Donald E. Walker Scholarship
- Make-A-Wish Foundation “Inner Circle Award” winner
- President of Sigma Chi Fraternity
- University of Pittsburgh Homecoming Court
Law School:Duquesne University School Of Law, Juris Doctor June 2005
- Graduated with honors
- Finalist in the Carol Los Mansmann Appellate Advocacy Competition
- Duquesne Forensic Science and Law Journal
- West Virginia
- New York
- United States District Courts for the Western and Eastern Districts of Pennsylvania
- United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
- United States Supreme Court
- Defense Research Institute, Committee Member Young Lawyers Division
- The Harmonie Group Next Generation Liaison
- American Bar Association
- Pennsylvania Bar Association
- Allegheny County Bar Association Member PUMP
- State trial courts and administrative bodies in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia, and various other state and federal courts throughout the United States
Pennsylvania Office Of Attorney General:Legal Intern – Torts Litigation Section, Environmental Crimes Section
Governor’s Office Of General Counsel:Legal Intern – State Department
Mr. Zeli successfully obtained dismissal of all claims against Defendant employer at summary judgment stage after plaintiff levied allegations his employer exposed him to elevated levels of manganese during his career as a welder. After years of litigation, Plaintiff agreed to dismiss Defendant employer on the eve of summary judgment arguments.
Mr. Zeli successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of Defendant general contractor after years of litigation from claims of negligence related to the death of an employee of a subcontractor who fell to his death from scaffolding while working on a jobsite. Plaintiffs’ alleged Defendant general contractor was negligent for failing to properly supervise subcontractors.
Mr. Zeli secured a favorable settlement on behalf of Pennsylvania Corporation against Tennessee Corporation for breach of contract based on Tennessee Corporation’s failure to pay lease fees for use of specialized machinery used for natural gas drilling. Tennessee Corporation alleged machines at issue were defective, however, after months of negotiations agreed to pay lease fees.
Mr. Zeli successfully obtained dismissal of all charges for employee of Defendant trucking company after criminal charges were filed related to a motor vehicle accident that resulted in serious injuries. After being found guilty, on appeal, Mr. Zeli successfully argued that Defendant was improperly charged based on a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision resulting in all charges being dropped.
Mr. Zeli successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of Defendant manufacturer from claims of negligence and strict liability related to the death of a steel worker who suffered from mesothelioma. Mr. Zeli successfully argued that Defendant could not be held liable based on Ohio law despite his client’s acknowledgement that they supplied asbestos products to Plaintiff’s worksite because of a lack of causation. After oral arguments, the judge granted Defendant manufacturer’s summary judgment.Back to team page